Spotlight on Games
1001 Nights of Military Gaming
- G -
On to H
Science fiction wargame (microgame) follow-on to Ogre adds more counters,
a larger map and the possibility of battles not including the Ogre
units, or Ogre units on both sides. Back in 1981 the designer informed me that the
correct pronunciation is to spell out the three letters: G-E-V.
[Steve Jackson Games]
- Galactic Emperor
The tagline here seeems to be
"space exploration plus combat employing
mechanics", but let's dig into that a little bit.
Just as in Andreas Seyfarth's game, there are roles
which players choose: explore, move/fight, mine resources,
sell resources, build ships, claim planets, buy technology,
etc. But what the original has is that the order and frequency
of the role choices matter. Here it generally makes little
difference if a fight occurs before or after a build as both
sides will usually build about the same amount. The technology
path ends about halfway through as there just isn't much
technology available. Earnings issues are greatly undermined
by a rule that grants every player free income at the start of
each turn. If a game is to use mechanics from Puerto
Rico, wouldn't it at least have made sense to employ them
in a meaningful way? As to the rest, there is little new to be
experienced. Players begin in corners of the map and draft
new hexagonal tiles to add and then claim. Most planets
produce some resources; food is needed to support planets
while the others produce ships and technology. A couple tiles
such the sun and black hole have special movement effects.
This is a plastic pieces game and the ships come in fighter,
cruiser and dreadnought sizes. When enemy ships encounter one
another, the inevitable dicefest begins. Dreadnoughts can be
damaged and then recover so it would be nice to be able to
flip them over to indicate this state, but it's awkward to do
so. What can be even more awkward are the diplomatic aspects,
the kingmaking and ganging up possibilities that can effectively
knock out a player long before the playing is over, which by
the way can last several hours, especially as the number of players
Strategy: Low; Theme: High; Tactics: High; Evaluation: Low; Personal Rating: 4
Adam West; CrossCut Games; 2008; 3-6
[Buy it at Amazon]
- Galaxy: The Dark Ages
Reiner Knizia design developed by Don Greenwood
is the third outing for the system which began with Knizia's
Grand National Derby
and was continued by Greenwood and Avalon Hill as
Titan: the Arena.
This latter cluttered up an elegant racing and betting system
with special abilities on each card type.
Now the chrome level has ratcheted up yet another level as
every single card in the game has a special ability.
Although the effort will probably succeed in awakening more
hardcore wargamers to the possibilities of German-style games, absent
such considerations this is on the whole not a positive development
for the system. The special card rules are not available to players
during the game and are far too numerous, thus working against rather than
in favor of planning. Worse, all of the options require so much reading
and, after their play, resolution, that ten minutes can pass and the player
fall asleep between turns of this otherwise simple game.
Fortunately the original version can still be achieved even using this
edition by simply ignoring all of the extra elaborations.
Avalon Hill game based on gangster activities in an American city
is itself based on Supergang by the French Ludodélire and
was originally set in a Mediterranean coast town, perhaps inspired
by the Hitchcock film
To Catch a Thief?
Players have a
limited number of actions on their turn which they must decide on
before time expires.
It may have been state of the art for its time, but by now the mechanics feel
distinctly clunky. The various strategies for winning do not appear balanced either.
- Global War
Wargame simulating all of the theaters of World War II. For its
time an amazing undertaking in scope and its production system was
especially brilliant, being adopted mostly wholesale by successor
World in Flames.
Unrealistic naval rules, especially
Anti-submarine air units, and too strong fortresses doom it as a
Wargame with a silly science fiction theme but not without interest
as there are plenty of tactical decisions for both players. If both
play perfectly the game probably comes down to luck of the dice and
Longish space wargame with interesting government and production rules.
Three dimensional movement simulated by showing multiple levels within
each hex, a system later used by Holy War.
- Golden Horde, The
Two-player wargame about the Mongol expansion of the thirteenth
century. Very simplistic and
drab presentation. Units are labeled only for speed and combat
effectiveness. Mongol forces wander the map destroying enemy
nations, who cannot leave their home countries. Unusual topic
is the only thing recommending this one, but even then anyone
who has read a good book on the topic can probably invent something
- Grave Robbers from Outer Space
Card game for up to six (or more) satirizing the conventions of the horror movie genre.
Every card contains a keyword. In the warm up six are revealed and players
cooperate to form from them a movie title, e.g. "Tale of the Howling Cannibal Werewolf
vs. Satan Unchained". By the end, players receive five points per card held
(openly or privately) matching the capitalized words in addition to
whatever strength they have built up in characters, props and locations.
Meanwhile they attack one another with various movie monsters.
Why monsters should attack a director's scene is never explained, a nonsensical
reality and a thematic problem.
Characters have traits which give advantages and disadvantages and
most cards have some special associated ability which supersedes the normal rules.
There is so much information on the cards presented only in text that it can
sometimes hinder the usual rate of play. There are also a huge number of
quite powerful play-anytime special effects cards which just add more to
what is fundamentally a rather chaotic matter of drawing the right cards.
To its credit, the satire is dead on and players simply must read aloud
the color cutely-illustrated cards as they play them or miss out on a lot of humor.
Those hoping for challenging play mechanics will be disappointed however and
among those even a little serious about their playing, this one will be played
once and revived only when the jokes have been forgotten.
Fans of this topic may prefer the horror module of Deadwood.
Nineteen years ago there was Slasher
Flick, which used a positional board rather than
"take that" cards, but the conventions it poked fun at were
exactly the same. The difference is that back then it was
enough to provide just the characters and situations: the
players did the rest. Despite all the examples provided
by the Scream movies, now even the words to say
are being provided. Is it a good thing that more value is
included or a reflection that the audience is so media-fed
that their ability to create their own fun has been lost?
An expansion which can also be played standalone satirizes
jungle movies: Cannibal Pygmies in the Jungle of Doom.
[Take That! Card Games] [Z-Man Games]
- Great Khan Game, The
Tom Wham light wargame from 1989 has a few interesting ideas, but
looks rather obsolete today. The fictional fantasy world contains
a few punning references not to mention an entire southern
quarter of the map that never comes into play. Players draw
cards which can be played to gain control of various kingdoms
which provides more income which can be used to acquire even
more cards. Strangely for a military game, victory is based
on having the most money when the end of game card –
cleverly "The Historian" – appears. But his appearance is
very random and the game's length could be anywhere from ten
minutes to three hours. The course of play is likewise random
and it's quite possible to spend most of your time unable to
actually do anything on the board if your draws are unfortunate.
Meanwhile your opponents just get richer and richer. There are
cards to try and help trailing players, but these really don't go
far enough. There is a combat system involving both to-hit rolls
and saving throws which takes a lot longer than it ought. The
card buying cost schedule is unnecessarily complicated as well.
Perhaps the most interesting feature is the pyramid structure
in each kingdom. Each personality can only follow certain other
ones so players are sometimes limited in what they can do and how
they can exploit what they have. Unfortunately the potential of
the idea is mostly wasted as the situation is so luck ridden and
restrictive. Card trading would have been a nice idea here since
players are pursuing different local objectives and a lot of it
could be win-win. As it is, this is an interesting milestone in
1980's dead zone for strategy games, but not really worthwhile
these days. Features one of the largest card decks around.
- Great War at Sea, Vol I.
Two-player wargame of many scenarios of World War I naval
combat. Game system is simple, yet still real enough to engender
interest. One really has to be a fan of the Great War
because many of the scenarios have problems. In one scenario
my friend and I spent fifty turns waiting for one or the other
to engage in combat – it is hidden movement – but it
turned out that my friend never left port! He had calculated
that he had only a 50% chance of success so it was much
better to just stay where he was! As a result he no longer
will play this game. We did have some fun with some of
the better scenarios prior to that however.
- Great War in the East, The: Serbia-Galicia
Unusual two-player wargame set in the First World War. There are two linked
maps, the Austrio-Hungarian Empire (AHE) forces being able to travel between them
in a limited way. One map has the AHE as the aggressor in Serbia while
the other has the Russians crossing a wide map to reach the AHE positions.
In the first game, a great deal relies on just one or two dice rolls as
the Serbians have a great commander who may or may not be effective,
while in the latter the Russians can usually do well if they play a
detailed game and count out their hex movements ahead of time.
More of interest for learning the history of the campaign than as a game
with different strategies to try more than a couple times.
Originally published by SPI, later re-released by Decision Games in an
almost identical edition.
- Great War in the East, The: Tannenberg
Technically not part of the The Great War in the East Quad as
it is a magazine game rather than being part of the same box, but it
uses the same rules as the other entries in the system
(The Brusilov Offensive,
Von Hindenburg in Poland), so it is the
"fifth wheel" if you like.
Simulates the rather amazing victory of very small German forces vs.
two invading Russian armies, either of which was larger than the German one.
David C. Isby design includes "iron maiden" rules by which the Russian
player is hampered by some of the "stupidity" which partly caused this
result. Those wanting to re-fight the battle more effectively than the
Russians did can simply omit these while those wanting to understand
how the Germans achieved this surprising result can simply leave them in.
In the latter case, it might be good to actually play, as the rules recommend,
with three participants, the two Russian players not being allowed to talk
to one another as was the case historically. The map and background have
a wonderful feeling of historicity. Rules are slightly more involved than
other games of this type.
Card and dice game about the cartoon character is sort of a king
of the hill struggle or, more often, "let's you and him fight".
Prone to kingmaking situations with a fair amount of luck of the draw and dice.
[Take That! Card Games]
Card war game with a theme around conflict in Latin American in the 1980's.
Players build up holdings on the table of weapons and personnel
and attempt to destroy those of others.
Each has a secret identity, one of government, rebel or mercenary.
The former two maximize points by destroying the forces of the other while
mercenaries receive points for either. At a random poont there appear
cards which swap the identities of two players, choice going to the
drawing player, a feature rendering any long term strategy mostly
- Guillotine [Wizards of the Coast]
Card game akin to
and as I understand it,
by the same designer. The topic here is the French Revolution and
the players are executioners trying to collect heads. While the
game may appear to be random, if one knows exactly what cards are
in each deck, it can also appeal to more serious players. The
silly, colorful illustrations and sayings will probably appeal to all.
Please forward any comments and additions for this site to